What Is a Prospective Cohort Study? | Definition & Examples

A prospective cohort study is a type of observational study focused on following a group of people (called a cohort) over a period of time, collecting data on their exposure to a factor of interest. Their outcomes are then tracked, in order to investigate the association between the exposure and the outcome.

It is crucial to note that in order to be considered a prospective cohort study, your participants must not possess the disease or health outcome being studied.

When to use a prospective cohort study

Prospective cohort studies are a type of observational study often used in fields related to health and medicine. While most observational studies are qualitative in nature, prospective cohort studies are often quantitative, as they use preexisting secondary research data. They can be used to conduct both exploratory research and explanatory research.

In prospective cohort studies, data is collected over time to compare the occurrence of the outcome of interest in those who were exposed to the risk factor and those who were not. This can help ascertain whether the risk factor could be associated with the outcome.

A prospective cohort study could be a good fit for your research if:

1. You have access to a large pool of research subjects and are comfortable with a long timeline (i.e., many years).
2. You are interested in the long-term effects of preventive or therapeutic treatment against exposure to a risk factor.
3. Your research needs a stronger argument for potential causality than can be provided by retrospective cohort studies or case-control studies.

Examples of prospective cohort studies

Prospective cohort studies are common in fields like medicine, epidemiology, and healthcare.

Advantages and disadvantages of prospective cohort studies

Prospective cohort studies can be a good fit for a wide range of research projects, particularly in health-related fields. However, they also have a few disadvantages to consider.

Advantages of prospective cohort studies

• Prospective cohort studies are better able to suggest causality than other types of observational studies due to their ability to establish temporality. Here, temporality allows researchers to determine that the exposure preceded the outcome, strengthening a claim for a cause-and-effect relationship between the two variables.
• While not immune, prospective cohort studies are less prone to research biases than other observational studies because they collect data before the outcome being studied occurs. This helps minimize the risk of biases like recall bias and selection bias, among others, and can even collect data on multiple outcomes over time, helping to identify new relationships between exposures and outcomes.
• Because prospective cohort studies usually rely on large groups of participants, they are more likely to use a sampling method to recruit a much more representative sample of the population. This leads to findings that are typically much more generalizable, with higher internal validity and external validity.

Disadvantages of prospective cohort studies

• Given their reliance on the recruitment of large groups of participants over long periods of time, prospective cohort studies can be both very time consuming and very expensive to conduct.
• While less prone to bias than other observational studies, they are not immune. In particular, prospective cohort studies are at risk for biases inherent to long-term studies like attrition bias and survivorship bias if participants drop out over time. The risk of confounding variables entering analysis over time can also affect the argument for causality, and measurement errors like omitted variable bias and information bias can further confound analysis.
• Like other experimental designs, prospective cohort studies can raise ethical considerations, particularly if the exposure of interest is harmful or if there is no known treatment for it. As a researcher, it is critical to ensure that participation in studies is voluntary, informed, and as safe as it can be for research subjects, and that they are able to give informed consent.

Other interesting articles

If you want to know more about statistics, methodology, or research bias, make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between a prospective and retrospective cohort study?

The easiest way to remember the difference between prospective and retrospective cohort studies is timing. 

• A prospective cohort study moves forward in time, following a group of participants to track the development of an outcome of interest.
• A retrospective cohort study moves backward in time, first identifying a group of people who already possess the outcome of interest, and then looking backwards to assess their exposure to a risk factor.

What is the difference between a prospective cohort study and a randomized controlled trial?

A prospective cohort study follows a group of participants over a period of time to track the development of an outcome of interest, while a randomized controlled trial tests the effectiveness of a specific intervention on a group of people.

Randomized controlled trials are considered the “gold standard” when attempting to argue for causality, as they provide the most suitable conditions to do so. Prospective cohort studies, while a solid and mostly generalizable choice, are better suited for studying the natural progression of diseases or health outcomes.

How are participants selected for a prospective cohort study?

Participants for a prospective cohort study are typically selected from a defined population, ideally using probability sampling and based on defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Once recruited, the participants are followed over a period of time (usually a fairly long one) in order to track the development of the outcome of interest.